Sampling event Registered February 15, 2016

    Large mammals in Israel from camera traps

    Published by Hamaarag

    Description

    Observations of large mammals composed from camera traps. The monitoring array takes place in 11 monitoring units, while some of the larger units are further divided into subunits (different geographical regions) or habitats (different ecosystems). In some of the units the effect of proximity to man-made elements was also evaluated; in such cases there are also distinct sample sites near and far from the studied effect (e.g. settlements). Each unit x subunit x habitat x proximity combination usually contains 5 monitoring sites. In each such site, we positioned a transect of 900 m of 9 camera traps (with 100 m gaps) for about 10 days. All mammal photos were identified and grouped into observation events (represented by rows in the data file); an observation event is a set adjacent photos of the same species.
    Occupancy and activity levels estimates derived from HAMAARAG's large mammals monitoring program data play an important role in acting as indicators for trends in biodiversity, habitat change and climate change.
    New collaborations are extremely valuable to make the most of the data. Researchers are welcome to contact the dataset creator to collaborate on comparative analyses and meta-analysis.

    Purpose

    The main objective of the scheme is to provide a systematic and recurrent assessment on the state of large mammals populations in several of the main habitat types in Israel, for both conservation and research purposes.

    Geographic scope

    Description

    Israel

    Latitude
    From 29.47 to 33.41
    Longitude
    From 34.19 to 35.89

    Temporal scope

    range
    January 01, 2012 - December 31, 2014

    Taxonomic scope

    Description

    Large mammals

    Coverage
    Mammaliamammals

    Methodology

    Sampling

    In each such site, we positioned a transect of 900 m of 9 camera traps (with 100 m gaps) for about 10 days. All mammal photos were identified and grouped into observation events (represented by rows in the attached file); an observation event is a set of adjacent photos of the same species.

    Study extent

    The monitoring array takes place in 11 monitoring units, while some of the larger units are further divided into subunits (different geographical regions) or habitats (different ecosystems). In some of the units the effect of proximity to man-made elements was also evaluated; in such cases there are also distinct sample sites near and far from the studied effect (e.g. settlements). Each unit x subunit x habitat x proximity combination usually contains 5 monitoring sites.

    Quality control

    Each identification (scientific name) is matched against the GBIF Backbone Taxonomy as a quality control to make sure that each identification is correct.

    Method steps
    1. In each such site, we positioned a transect of 900 m of 9 camera traps (with 100 m gaps) for about 10 days.

    2. All mammal photos were identified and grouped into observation events (represented by rows in the data file); an observation event is a set adjacent photos of the same species.

    3. To the data file, added the spatial location (taken from the camera position, and averaged per site in this particular version), the time of the event and an individual count.

    Contacts

    GBIF registration

    Registration date
    February 15, 2016
    Metadata last modified
    March 27, 2017
    Publication date
    December 23, 2016
    Hosted by
    GBIF Secretariat
    Installation
    EUBON IPT
    Endpoints
    Darwin Core Archive
    EML
    Preferred identifier
    10.15468/7cozwv
    Alternative identifiers

    Citation

    Dorman M (2016). Large mammals in Israel from camera traps. Version 1.5. Hamaarag. Sampling event dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/7cozwv accessed via GBIF.org on 2025-08-17.